The association of sexual behavior with oropharyngeal cancer and correlations with HPV-16 serologic status

Objectives. This hospital-based case-case study compared the characteristics of sexual behavior in patients with cancer of the oropharynx to patients with cancers of other head and neck sites. Additionally, the prevalence of certain sexual behaviors of HPV-16 seropositive head and neck cancer patients was compared to that of seronegative patients. ^ Methods. One hundred sixty five oropharyngeal cancer patients and 86 patients with cancers of other head and neck sites completed a sexual history questionnaire. ^ Results. Oropharyngeal cancer patients were significantly more likely to have had a greater number of lifetime sex partners, to have engaged in oral-genital sex, and to have had a greater number of oral-genital sex partners than non-oropharyngeal cancer patients. Oral-genital sex was significantly more common in the HPV-16 seropositive group. ^ Conclusion. These findings add to the evidence that HPV-16 is sexually transmitted to the upper aerodigestive tract and that certain sexual behaviors increase the risk for HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer. ^

Polymorphisms of the DNA repair gene MGMT and risk and progression of head and neck cancer.

Methylating agents are involved in carcinogenesis, and the DNA repair protein O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) removes methyl group from O(6)-methylguanine. Genetic variation in DNA repair genes has been shown to contribute to susceptibility to squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). We hypothesize that MGMT polymorphisms are associated with risk of SCCHN. In a hospital-based case-control study of 721 patients with SCCHN and 1234 cancer-free controls frequency-matched by age, sex and ethnicity, we genotyped four MGMT polymorphisms, two in exon 3, 16195C>T and 16286C>T and two in the promoter region, 45996G>T and 46346C>A. We found that none of these polymorphisms alone had a significant effect on risk of SCCHN. However, when these four polymorphisms were evaluated together by the number of putative risk genotypes (i.e. 16195CC, 16286CC, 45996GT+TT, and 46346CA+AA), a statistically significantly increased risk of SCCHN was associated with the combined genotypes with three to four risk genotypes, compared with those with zero to two risk genotypes (adjusted odds ratio (OR)=1.27; 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.05-1.53). This increased risk was also more pronounced among young subjects (OR=1.81; 95% CI=1.11-2.96), men (OR=1.24; 95% CI=1.00-1.55), ever smokers (OR=1.25; 95%=1.01-1.56), ever drinkers (OR=1.29; 95% CI=1.04-1.60), patients with oropharyngeal cancer (OR=1.45; 95% CI=1.12-1.87), and oropharyngeal cancer with regional lymph node metastasis (OR=1.52; 95% CI=1.16-1.89). In conclusion, our results suggest that any one of MGMT variants may not have a substantial effect on SCCHN risk, but a joint effect of several MGMT variants may contribute to risk and progression of SCCHN, particularly for oropharyngeal cancer, in non-Hispanic whites.

Association of TNF-alpha genetic variants with HPV-associated oral cancer risk---a case-control study

The incidence of OSCC in younger population and in those who never smoked or drank has increased since the last decade. This increase may be attributable to increase of infection with HPV. The pro-inflammatory cytokine TNF-&agr; has the role in the pathogenesis of chronic inflammatory diseases and was found to control HPV infection in cervical cancer studies. Our study aimed to investigate the association between the four polymorphisms located in TNF-&agr; promoter region, -308(rs1800629), -857(rs1799724), -863(rs1800630) and -1031(rs1799964), and the risk of HPV-related OSCC. In this hospital-based case-control study, 325 cases and 335 controls were included. We found that HPV 16 seropositivity was associated with an increased risk of oral cancer (OR = 3.1, 95% CI, 2.1–4.6). Each of the polymorphism showed to increase the risk of HPV-related OSCC. And after combining the risk genotypes and using the low-risk group (0–1 combined risk genotypes) and HPV16 seronegativity as the reference group, only the high-risk groups (3–4 combined risk genotypes) and HPV16 seronegativity were associated with a low OR of 1.8 (95% CI, 1.1–2.8), while the low-risk and high-risk groups and HPV16 seropositivity were significantly associated with a higher OR of 2.7 (95% CI, 1.3–5.8) and 8.5 (95% CI, 3.7–19.4), respectively. In addition, the joint effects were greater among the young subjects (aged<50), males, never smokers or never drinkers, and patients with oropharyngeal cancer. Overall, the four TNF-&agr; polymorphisms, individually or collectively, would result in a significantly increased risk for HPV16-associated oral cancer in a non-Hispanic white population. More large sized studies are needed for future investigation.^

Molecular epidemiological studies on genetic predispositions to squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Two molecular epidemiological studies were conducted to examine associations between genetic variation and risk of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). In the first study, we hypothesized that genetic variation in p53 response elements (REs) may play roles in the etiology of SCCHN. We selected and genotyped five polymorphic p53 REs as well as a most frequently studied p53 codon 72 (Arg72Pro, rs1042522) polymorphism in 1,100 non-Hispanic White SCCHN patients and 1,122 age-and sex-matched cancer-free controls recruited at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. In multivariate logistic regression analysis with adjustment for age, sex, smoking and drinking status, marital status and education level, we observed that the EOMES rs3806624 CC genotype had a significant effect of protection against SCCHN risk (adjusted odds ratio= 0.79, 95% confidence interval =0.64–0.98), compared with the -838TT+CT genotypes. Moreover, a significantly increased risk associated with the combined genotypes of p53 codon 72CC and EOMES -838TT+CT was observed, especially in the subgroup of non-oropharyneal cancer patients. The values of false-positive report probability were also calculated for significant findings. In the second study, we assessed the association between SCCHN risk and four potential regulatory single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of DEC1 (deleted in esophageal cancer 1) gene, a candidate tumor suppressor gene for esophageal cancer. After adjustment for age, sex, and smoking and drinking status, the variant -606CC (i.e., -249CC) homozygotes had a significantly reduced SCCHN risk (adjusted odds ratio = 0.71, 95% confidence interval = 0.52–0.99), compared with the -606TT homozygotes. Stratification analyses showed that a reduced risk associated with the -606CC genotype was more pronounced in subgroups of non-smokers, non-drinkers, younger subjects (defined as ≤ 57 years), carriers of TP53 Arg/Arg (rs1042522) genotype, patients with oropharyngeal cancer or late-stage SCCHN. Further in silico analysis revealed that the -249 T-to-C change led to a gain of a transcription factor binding site. Additional functional analysis showed that the -249T-to-C change significantly enhanced transcriptional activity of the DEC1 promoter and the DNA-protein binding activity. We conclude that the DEC1 promoter -249 T>C (rs2012775) polymorphism is functional, modulating susceptibility to SCCHN among non-Hispanic Whites. Additional large-scale, preferably population-based studies are needed to validate our findings.^